O'Neal v. Merkel, (4th Cir. 1996)
Linked as:
Text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7795
TERENCE KENNETH O'NEAL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
T. E. MERKEL; NURSE CASHWELL; NURSE ALLEN;
NURSE DAVIS; MR. CONN, Defendants - Appellees, and
FRAN KLIN E. FREEMAN, JR.; GARY DIXON; DOCTOR LOWY; DOCTOR SHAW; DOCTOR CASTALLOE; HARRY
ALLSBROOK; MR. CHERRY, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-94-476-5-CT-H)
Submitted: October 31, 1996 Decided: November 18, 1996
Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terence Kenneth O'Neal, Appellant Pro Se. Mark John Pletzke, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. O'Neal v. Merkel , No. CA-94-476-5-CT-H (E.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Sponsored links
