Nance v. Henderson, (4th Cir. 2001)

Text

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1917 RONALD I. NANCE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

WILLIAM J. HENDERSON, Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-

trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-99-257)

Submitted: January 31, 2001 Decided: March 19, 2001

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Angela Newell Gray, GRAY, NEWELL, JOHNSON & BLACKMON, L.L.P.,

Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Walter C. Holton, Jr.,

United States Attorney, Lynn P. Klauer, Assistant United States

Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina; Lori J. Dym, Brian M. Reimer,

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM

Ronald I. Nance appeals from the district court’s order awarding summary judgment to the Postal Service on his employment discrimination claims. Our review of the record, the parties’ briefs, and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Henderson , No. CA-99-257 (M.D.N.C. June 15, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

---