Morrissey v. Jackson, (4th Cir. 1998)
Linked as:
Text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1550 MICHAEL J. MORRISSEY; CATHERINE M. JACKSON, Petitioners - Appellants, versus
GREER JACKSON, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CA-98-87)
Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 3, 1998
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Michael J. Morrissey, Catherine M. Jackson, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM
Michael Morrissey and Catherine M. Jackson appeal the district court§ 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district courtÂ’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Morrissey v. Jackson , No. CA-98-87 (E.D. Va. Mar. 12, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Sponsored links
