Mills v. Owens, (4th Cir. 1999)
Linked as:
Text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6761 ALBERT CURTIS MILLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
MR. OWENS, Defendant - Appellee. No. 98-6762 ALBERT CURTIS MILLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
JOHNNIE WATKINS, Defendant - Appellee. No. 98-6913 ALBERT CURTIS MILLS, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MR. OWENS, Defendant - Appellee. No. 98-6920 ALBERT CURTIS MILLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
MR. OWENS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
-3334-DKC, CA-97-3335-DKC)
Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 17, 1999
Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Nos. 98-6761 and 98-6762 dismissed and Nos. 98-6913 and 98-6920
affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Albert Curtis Mills, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Gloria Wilson Shelton, David Phelps Kennedy,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM
Albert Curtis Mills appeals various district court orders in two 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) actions. We have reviewed the records and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. We dismiss the appeals in Nos. 98-6761 and 98-6762, because Mills seeks to appeal non-existent orders. In Nos. 98-6913 and 98-6920, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Mills v. Owens; Mills v. Watkins , Nos. CA-97-3334-DKC; CA-97-3335- DKC(D.Md.June4&5, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. Nos. 98-6761/98-6762 - DISMISSED Nos. 98-6913/98-6920 - AFFIRMED
Sponsored links
