McCoy v. Prado, (4th Cir. 2001)
Linked as:
Text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7450 FRANKIE L. MCCOY, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
MARTA PRADO; DOCTOR WAYNE; DORTHY TRIBBLE,
Administrative Nurse, individually and offi-
cial capacity; LOUISE STEWARD, Assistant War-
den; JAMES PEGEUESS, Chief of Security;
MARLENE SHELBY, Defendants - Appellees, and
L. CHANEY, Captain; R. MARTIN, Lieutenant;
SERGEANT COWAN; D. INGRAM, Sergeant, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-99-
4-L)
Submitted: February 28, 2001 Decided: March 19, 2001
Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald Joseph Crawford,
GODARD, WEST & ADELMAN, P.C., Rockville, Maryland; John Joseph
Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Gloria Wilson Shelton, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM
Frankie McCoy appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McCoy v. Prado , No. CA-99-1464-L (D. Md. Sept. 26, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Sponsored links
