McCallum v. Bank One, (4th Cir. 2003)

Federal Circuits

Linked as:

Text


UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1743 STEPHANIE P. MCCALLUM, Doctor, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

BANK ONE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-

-1394-CCB)

Submitted: August 8, 2003 Decided: October 22, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephanie P. McCallum, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM

Stephanie P. McCallum seeks to appeal the district courtÂ’s order transferring her case to the Northern District of Illinois.

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order McCallum seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See TechnoSteel, LLC v. Beers Constr. Co. , 271 F.3d 151, 154 (4th Cir. 2001); Gower v. Lehman , 799 F.2d 925, 927 (4th Cir. 1986). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny McCallumÂ’s motions for transcripts and for a change of ve nue. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company