Marshall vs. Cain, (5th Cir. 2000)

Federal Circuits

Linked as:

Text


* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-30968 Summary Calendar LANDON MARSHALL, Petitioner-Appellant, versus BURL CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 99-CV-592-J July 19, 2000 Before JOLLY, JONES and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Landon Marshall appeals from the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition as time-barred.

The dis trict court granted a certificate of appealability on the question whether the district court should have e quitably tolled the limitation period. We affirm.

Mar s hall argues that the district court should have equitably tolled the one year limitation period of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) because his inmate counsel substitute incorrectly interpreted the applicable filing deadlines. Marshall's ignorance of legal requirements does not justify equitable tolling. S ee Felder v. Johnson , 204 F.3d 168, 172 (5th Cir. 2000). Marshall has failed to show tha t he was actively misled or prevented in some extraordinary way from asserting his rights. S ee Coleman v. Johnson , 184 F.3d 398, 402 (5th Cir. 1999), c ert. denied , 120 S. Ct. 1564 (2000).

AFFIRMED.

No. 99-30968

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company