Llewyln v. Medford, (4th Cir. 2002)
Linked as:
Text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-8073 CHARLES LLEWYLN, a/k/a Owen Oddman, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
BOBBY LEE MEDFORD, Sheriff, Buncombe County;
LIEUTENANT EVANS, Facility Administration, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CA-01-54-MU)
Submitted: June 13, 2002 Decided: June 18, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Llewyln, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
* To the extent Appellant seeks to appeal the Court’s order denying § 1983 relief, his December 10, 2001 notice of appeal is
untimely as to that order, which was entered on the court’s docket
on July 30, 2001. Appellant never sought an extension of time in
which to appeal or reopening of the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or (a)(6). We have construed Appellant’s informal
brief filed in this Court as a timely notice of appeal from the
denial of reconsideration. See
Smith v. Barry
, 502 U.S. 244, 248 (1992). 2 PER CURIAM:
Charles Llewyln appeals the district court’s order denying his
Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reconsider its denial of relief
under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001). * We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Llewyln v. Medford
, No. CA-01-54-MU (W.D.N.C. Jan. 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Sponsored links
