US v. Lino Haynes, (4th Cir. 2011)

Status: Not Published

Linked as:

Text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6114

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LINO H. HAYNES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.,

Senior District Judge. (2:90-cr-00105-HCM-TEM-1)

Submitted: September 29, 2011 Decided: November 3, 2011

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lino H. Haynes, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg,

Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Lino H. Haynes appeals the district court's order denying his "motion to vacate judgment" pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.

P. 60(b), which Haynes attempted to file in his criminal case.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Haynes, No. 2:90-cr-00105-HCM-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 19 & entered Nov. 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED