Lee v. Freeman, (4th Cir. 1997)
Linked as:
Text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7169 GREGORY MAURICE LEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
FRANKLIN FREEMAN; LYNN PHILLIPS; THE UTILI-
ZATION REVIEW BOARD; DOCTOR STOVER; DOCTOR
HENRY; RICK JACKSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District
Judge. (CA-96-128-3-MU)
Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: December 3, 1997
Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Maurice Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Herre Erwin, Assistant
Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lee v. Freeman , No. CA-96-128-3-MU (W.D.N.C. July 14, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Sponsored links
