Launeil Sanders v. Peter Gilchrist, (4th Cir. 2011)
Linked as:
Text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1303
LAUNEIL SANDERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PETER S. GILCHRIST, Mecklenburg County City Attorney; MORGAN
STANLEY SMITH BARNEY FINANCIAL, LLC; DANIEL CLIFTON, Attorney;
EDWARD L. BOOKER, Attorney,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:10-cv-00068-MOC-DSC)
Submitted: June 30, 2011 Decided: July 5, 2011
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Launeil Sanders, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Launeil Sanders appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Sanders v.
Gilchrist, No. 3:10-cv-00068-MOC-DSC (W.D.N.C. Mar. 22, 2011).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Sponsored links
