Lamberth vs. Apfel, (5th Cir. 1998)
Linked as:
Text
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR .
R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-50928 Summary Calendar JAMES L. LAMBERTH, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-94-CV-796 March 2, 1998 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * James Lamberth appeals from the magistra te judgeÂ’s judgment affirming the denial of his application for supplemental security income. He argues that substantial evidence did not exist to support the finding that he was not disa bled. He further argues that the Magistrate Judge erred in not remanding his claim to the Administration in light of new evidence he submitted.
Substantial evidence existed to support the finding that Lamberth was not disabled. S ee Ripley v. Chater , 67 F.3d 552, 555 (5th Cir. 1995); Moore v. Sullivan , 91
AFFIRMED.
No. 96-50928
Sponsored links
This document cites
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - 49 Soc.Sec.Rep.Ser. 112, Unempl.Ins.Rep. (Cch) P 14847B Travis Ripley, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee., 67 F.3d 552 (5th Cir. 1995)
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - 45 Soc.Sec.Rep.Ser. 618, Unempl.Ins.Rep. (Cch) P 14170B Glenn G. Latham, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary Department of Health & Human Services, Defendant-Appellee., 36 F.3d 482 (5th Cir. 1994)
See other documents that cite the same legislation
