John W. Townshend v. Carroll Fisher, (8th Cir. 2004)

Federal Circuits

Linked as:

Text


United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-2033

John W. Townshend, Sr. Appellant, v. Carroll Fisher, Commissioner, Oklahoma Department of Insurance; State of Oklahoma Department of Insurance; Nancy Brewer, Sebastian County, Arkansas, Circuit Court Clerk; County of Sebastian, Arkansas; Linda Howard, Crawford County, Arkansas, Circuit Court Clerk; County of Crawford, Arkansas; Allan M. Ephraim, Chairman, Oklahoma State Board of Accountancy; Oklahoma Board of Public Accountancy, as agent for the State; James Ward, Executive Director, Arkansas State Board of Public Accountancy; Arkansas State Board of Public Accountancy, as agent for the State; Mike Pickens, Insurance Commissioner for the State of Arkansas; Arkansas Department of Insurance, Appellees.

Submitted: February 3, 2004

Filed: February 18, 2004

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

John Townshend appeals the district court§§ 1983, 1985, and 1986, arising out of (among other things) defendantsÂ’ alleged release and reliance upon certain records involving expunged or pardoned state criminal matters. Townshend claimed violations of due process, equal protection, and the Privileges and Immunities Clause.

After careful review of the record, we conclude Townshend failed to state a claim under section 1983 for a violation of his constitutional rights. See Lunding v. New York Tax App. Trib., 522 U.S. 287, 296 (1998) (Privileges and Immunities Clause); Herts v. Smith, 345 F.3d 581, 587 (8th Cir. 2003) (substantive due process); Booker v. City of St. Louis, 309 F.3d 464, 468 (8th Cir. 2002) (procedural due process), cert. denied, 124 S. Ct. 52 (2003); Keevan v. Smith, 100 F.3d 644, 647-48 (8th Cir. 1996) (equal protection). Townshend also failed to state a claim under section 1985 or section 1986. See Bray v. Alexandria Women§ 1985 claimant must allege race or class-based discriminatory animus behind conspiracy); Lewellen v. Raff, 843 F.2d 1103, 1116 (8th Cir. 1988) (§ 1986 claim is dependent on valid claim under § 1985), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1033 (1989).

Appeal from the United States

District Court for the Western

District of Arkansas.

[UNPUBLISHED]

Accordingly, we affirm, but because it appears to us that Townshend is raising state-law claims, we modify the dismissal order to be without prejudice to any remedies Townshend may have in state court.

[1] The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

Sponsored links




This document cites




See other documents that cite the same legislation

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company