James Gibson v. Wells Fargo Bank, (4th Cir. 2012)
Linked as:
Text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1165
JAMES O. GIBSON; TERI GIBSON,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
NECTAR PROJECTS, INCORPORATED,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O'Grady, District
Judge. (1:10-cv-00304-LO-IDD)
Submitted: December 13, 2011 Decided: January 4, 2012
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Edwin Brown, BROWN, BROWN, & BROWN, PC, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellants. D. Margeaux Witherspoon, Rachel
McGuckian, MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, P.C., McLean, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: James O. Gibson and Teri Gibson appeal the district court's orders denying the Gibsons leave to amend their responses to the Appellees' requests for admissions and granting summary judgment against the Gibsons in their action seeking to prevent the Appellees from foreclosing on their property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. In particular, we reject the Gibsons' assertion that our holding in Horvath v. Bank of New York, N.A., 641 F.3d 617 (4th Cir. 2011), precludes entry of summary judgment in favor of the Appellees and requires summary judgment in the Gibsons' favor.
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Sponsored links
