In Re. Harrison v., (4th Cir. 2007)

Federal Circuits

Linked as:

Text


UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6589

In Re: EUGENE HARRISON, a/k/a Eugene Paul

Harrison,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (9:06-cv-01203-PMD)

Submitted: August 10, 2007 Decided: August 24, 2007

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugene Harrison, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Eugene Harrison petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the South Carolina Department of Corrections and Sergeant Tucker, an employee of the correctional facility where Harrison is incarcerated, to provide photocopies. We conclude Harrison is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987).

The relief sought by Harrison is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company