Hoffman v. Hoffman, (4th Cir. 1997)
Linked as:
Text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2814
BARBARA HOFFMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
MICHAEL HOFFMAN; JOSEPH ROUSE; STATE OF MARY-
LAND; ASSIGNMENT OFFICE OF CIRCUIT COURT, ANNE
ARUNDEL COUNTY; KERRY ANDERSON; DAVID BOWERS;
GALE ANN BELUCCI; RICHARD BACHARACH, M.D.;
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; GINGER HOWARD;
INGRID HOFFMAN; SUE HOUSER; PAM ZIOLKOWSKI;
BERNIE DIVVER; EASTERN DISTRICT POLICE DEPART-
MENT OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY; TRACEY AGNEW;
KRYSTLE HOFFMAN, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96-
1-AMD)
Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 18, 1997
Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Barbara Hoffman, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM
Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing her complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1994), as amended by Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hof fman v. Hoffman , No. CA-96- 3541-AMD (D. Md. Nov. 25, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Sponsored links
