Herrell v. Angelone, (4th Cir. 2002)

Text

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6011 ROGER BRUCE HERRELL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. James E. Bradberry, Magistrate

Judge. (CA-01-24)

Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 29, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roger Bruce Herrell, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

* This case was decided by a magistrate judge exercising jurisdiction upon consent of the parties. 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c)

(West 1993 & Supp. 2001). 2 PER CURIAM:

Roger Bruce Herrell appeals the magistrate judge’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

4 & Supp. 2001). * We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the magistrate judge. See

Herrell v. Angelone

, No. CA-01-24 (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 19, 2001; entered Nov. 20, 2001). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED

---