Harris vs. Pacific, (5th Cir. 1996)
Linked as:
Text
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-60738 Summary Calendar JIMMY HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus JEANENNE PACIFIC; GRAY BURDICK; ANTHONY J. BUCKLEY; THOMAS GENE CLARK; DAVID RATCLIFF; BILLY JOE LANDRUM, Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi (2:95-CV-186-PS) May 21, 1996 Before JOHNSON, WIENER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Jimmy Harris (§ 1983 action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Harris contends that he was illegally sentenced to life in prison as a result of the defendantsÂ’ conspiracy and that the defendantsÂ’ actions violated his rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments. Having reviewed the record and HarrisÂ’s brief, we find no error in the district courtÂ’s dismissal of his civil rights action on frivolity grounds.
AFFIRMED.
Sponsored links
