Greg Givens v. Mitch Tolson, (4th Cir. 2011)

Federal Circuits

Linked as:

Text


UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1198

GREG GIVENS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MITCH TOLSON; RICHARD A. HAYHURST; RICHARD M. ADAMS, SR.;

JANE DOE I; JOHN DOE I,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District

Judge. (3:10-cv-00909-HEH)

Submitted: July 28, 2011 Decided: August 1, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Greg Givens, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Greg Givens appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Givens v. Tolson, No. 3:10-cv-00909-HEH (E.D. Va. Jan. 10, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company