Goodman v. Garraghty, (4th Cir. 2000)

Text

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6549 GREGORY DONNELL GOODMAN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

DAVID A. GARRAGHTY, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-

trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge.

(CA-99-299-AM)

Submitted: January 13, 2000 Decided: January 19, 2000

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Donnell Goodman, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on April 2, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on April 7, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58

and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date

the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the

effective date of the district court’s decision. See

Wilson v. Murray

, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM:

Gregory Donnell Goodman seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. According-

ly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal

on the reasoning of the district court. See

Goodman v. Garraghty

, No. CA-99-299-AM (E.D. Va. Apr. 7, 1999). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. DISMISSED

---