US v. Glenn Williams, (4th Cir. 2011)

Status: Not Published

Linked as:

Text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6797

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

GLENN WILLIAMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (5:95-cr-00136-F-3)

Submitted: October 12, 2011 Decided: October 21, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Glenn Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Glenn Williams appeals the district court's orders denying his 18U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence and denying his subsequent motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Williams' § 3582(c)(2) motion for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams, No. 5:95-cr-00136-F3 (E.D.N.C. May 17, 2011). Because the district court lacked the authority to consider Williams' motions for reconsideration, see United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 3530 (2010), we affirm the district court's orders denying the motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED