Text
George Sing Louie, in pro. per.
Michael J. Brady, of Ropers, Majeski, Kohn, Bentley & Wagner, Redwood City, Cal., for defendants-appellees.
Before HAMLEY, KOELSCH and 12, 28 U.S.C.A.
PER CURIAM:
The plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for inspection and copying under Rule 34, Fed.R.Civ.P.
The order being interlocutory, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Alexander v. United States, 201 U.S. 117, 26 S.Ct. 356, 50 L.Ed. 686 (1906); Lampman v. United States District Court, 418 F.2d 215 (9th Cir. 1969), cert. denied,
1 There is some doubt whether this appeal has been properly docketed. The ruling on this notice of appeal shall not relieve appellant of his duty to properly docket the appeal in the principal action as provided in Rule 12, Fed.R.App.P
Sponsored links
This document cites
- U.S. Supreme Court - Alexander v. United States, 201 U.S. 117 (1906)
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Owen B. Lampman and Thriftimart, Inc., a California Corporation, Petitioners, v. United States District Court for the Centeral District of California, Andjesse W. Curtis, a Judge Thereof, Respondents. in the Matter of the Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Served Upon Gershon L.Lewis. Gershon L. Lewis, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee. in the Matter of the Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Served Upon Joseph R.Bolker, President of Walpole Estates, Inc. Joseph R. Bolker, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee.
See other documents that cite the same legislation