Fisher v. Greenville County, (4th Cir. 2002)

Text

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6073 NATHAN FISHER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

GREENVILLE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE; E. E. WARE, Officer #515; T. D. HAMPTON, Officer; K. D. DURHAM, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CA-99-3473-2-08)

Submitted: April 30, 2002 Decided: May 15, 2002

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathan Fisher, Appellant Pro Se. Russell W. Harter, Jr., CHAPMAN,

HARTER & GROVES, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM

Nathan Fisher appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Fisher v. Greenville County Sheriff’s Office , No. CA-99-3473-2-08 (D.S.C. Dec. 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

---