Festus Ajetunmobi v. John Ashcroft, (8th Cir. 2002)

Federal Circuits

Linked as:

Text


United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1721

Festus Olakunle Ajetunmobi, Petitioner, v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Respondents.

Submitted: August 27, 2002

Filed: August 30, 2002

Before WOLLMAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Festus Olakunle Ajetunmobi, a Nigerian citizen and lawful permanent resident (LPR) of the United States, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which summarily affirmed the Immigration Judge§ 237(a)(2)(A)(ii) (8 U.S.C.§ 1227(a)(2)(A)(ii)) for having been convicted of two separate crimes involving moral turpitude, and under INA

§ 237(a)(2)(A)(iii) (8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii)) for having been convicted of an aggravated felony as defined in INA § 101(a)(43)(F) (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)(F)). We deny the petition.

Mr. Ajetunmobi argues that INA § 212(h) (8 U.S.C. 1182(h)), which prevented him from receiving a waiver of inadmissibility, violates equal protection by treating illegal aliens better than LPRs. See 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h) (no waiver of inadmissibility shall be granted to LPR who has been convicted of aggravated felony since admission). Although 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h) states that "[n]o court shall have jurisdiction to review a decision of the Attorney General to grant or deny a waiver [of inadmissibility]," Mr. Ajetunmobi§ 1182(h)§ 1182(h) easily passes equal protection muster"; Congress does not violate equal protection merely because classifications it makes are imperfect or result in some inequality).

The other issues Mr. Ajetunmobi seeks to raise either exceed the scope of this courtÂ’s jurisdiction to review directly a BIA determination, or lack merit, and some are duplicative of claims he has pending in a habeas corpus action.

Accordingly, we deny the petition.

Petition for Review of

an Order of the Immigration

and Naturalization Service.

[UNPUBLISHED]

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company