Eugene Santos v. Raymond Mabus, (4th Cir. 2011)

Text

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2151

EUGENE W. SANTOS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RAY MABUS, Secretary of the Navy,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 11-1488

EUGENE W. SANTOS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RAY MABUS, Secretary of the Navy,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District

of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, Chief

District Judge. (2:08-cv-03994-DCN)

Submitted: September 14, 2011 Decided: September 16, 2011

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher R. Pudelski, LAW OFFICES OF CHRISTOPHER R. PUDELSKI, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. William N. Nettles, United States Attorney, Terri Hearn Bailey, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Eugene Santos appeals the district court's orders granting summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of the Navy on Santos's employment discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006), and granting the Secretary's motion to supplement the record. We have reviewed the record and find that the district court did not commit reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. See Santos v. Winter, No. 2:08-cv-03994-DCN (D.S.C. Sept. 21, 2010 & May 5, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

---