Erwin B. Patterson, Jr. v. Towne Bank, (4th Cir. 2011)
Linked as:
Text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1113
ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR.,
Plaintiff ─ Appellant,
v.
TOWNE BANK; WILLIAM A. COPELAND; WILLIAM T. HODSDEN; ROBERT
HENRY BURGER; ROBERT L. SAMUELS, JR.; CITY OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA;
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA;
RAYMOND A. JACKSON,
Defendants ─ Appellees.
No. 11-1117
ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TEIDE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED; SARA A. JOHN; STUART GORDON;
JOHN C. LUMPKIN; JOHN C. LUMPKIN, P.C.; JON AHERN; SYKES,
BOURBON, AHERN & LEVY P.C.; JOSEPH FRANKLIN VERSER; LEONARD C.
HEATH, JR.; CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY; TOWNE
MORTGAGE; TOWNE BANK; WILLIAM A. COPELAND; WILLIAM T. HODSDEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; TEIDE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED; STUART GORDON; SARA A. JOHN, Esq.; JOHN C. LUMPKIN, Esq.; JOHN C. LUMPKIN P.C.; JOHN AHERN, Esq.; JOSEPH FRANKLIN VERSER, Esq.; LEONARD C. HEATH, JR., Esq.; CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY; TOWNE-MORTGAGE; TOWNE BANK; WILLIAM COPELAND; WILLIAM T. HODSDEN, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith; Raymond A. Jackson, District Judges. (2:10-cv-00437-RBS-FBS; 2:10-cv00434-RBS-FBS; 2:10-cv-00614-RBS-FBS) Submitted: June 30, 2011 Decided: July 5, 2011 Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Erwin B. Patterson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: In these consolidated cases, Erwin B. Patterson, Jr., appeals the district court's orders dismissing his civil complaints without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Patterson v. Towne Bank, No. 2:10-cv-00437-RBS-FBS; Patterson v. Teide Enters., Inc., No.
2:10-cv-00434-RBS-FBS; and Patterson v. United States, No. 2:10cv-00614-RBS-FBS (E.D. Va. Nov. 23, 2010; Nov. 5, 2010; and Jan. 12, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Sponsored links
