Text
George Ely, appellant pro se.
Before DONALD RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
George Ely appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec . 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ely v. Hagg, C/A No. 89-6-E(K) (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 17, 1989; Feb. 21, 1989).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
* Any challenge to the voluntariness of Ely's guilty plea to federal charges must be brought in an action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec . 2255. The district court correctly held that Ely must first exhaust his state remedies before challenging his state convictions in a 28 U.S.C. Sec . 2254 action
Sponsored links