Edward Jefferson v. J. Morgan, (4th Cir. 2012)
Linked as:
Text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7270
EDWARD W. JEFFERSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN J. PHILLIP MORGAN; ASSISTANT WARDEN FRANK B. BISHOP; LT.
LIKIN; MICHAEL P. THOMAS; SGT. BERRY; SGT. ANGLE; OFC. BRONSON
BECKER, Commissary; OFC. KNIGHT, Commissary; STEVEN, Registered
Nurse; OFC. N. ALEXANDER, Correctional Officer II; DANIEL
ANDREWS; OFFICER GEIGER, Correctional Officer II; OFFICER HETZ,
Correctional Officer II; OFFICER G. WILSON, Correctional Officer
II; OFC. FODELY, Correctional Officer II,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:11-cv-02066-JFM)
Submitted: January 31, 2012 Decided: February 3, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward W. Jefferson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Edward W. Jefferson seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing all but one of his claims and denying all but one of his motions to amend the underlying complaint.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Jefferson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dismiss Jefferson's motions for relief pending appeal and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Sponsored links
