Echols v. Angelone, (4th Cir. 2001)

Federal Circuits

Linked as:

Text


UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7246 ROY FRANKLIN ECHOLS, Jr., Petitioner - Appellant, versus

RONALD ANGELONE, Director of Virginia Depart-

ment of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-

trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.

(CA-01-155-3)

Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 6, 2001

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roy Franklin Echols, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells,

Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM

Roy Franklin Echols appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Echols v. Angelone , CA-01-155-3 (E.D. Va. June 18, 2001). We deny Echols’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company