Text
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CR No. 86-92)
Benae Floyd, appellant pro se.
John William McIntosh, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, S.C., for appellee.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, K.K. HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Benae Floyd appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec . 2255. Our review of the record discloses that there is sufficient evidence to support Floyd's convictions. Accordingly, we affirm the holding of the district court on that basis.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
* Contrary to the suggestion in the district court's opinion, a defendant does raise a cognizable claim when attacking the sufficiency of the evidence in a 28 U.S.C. Sec . 2255 petition. See Kaufman v. United States, 394 U.S. 217, 220-24 (1969)
Sponsored links