Dehoney v. Moore, (4th Cir. 1998)
Linked as:
Text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6640 MICHAEL F. DEHONEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
MICHAEL MOORE, South Carolina Department of
Corrections Director; CHARLIE J. CEPAK,
Warden; WILLIAM R. DAVIS, Warden, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. William B. Traxler, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-96-1356-4-21BE)
Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 15, 1998
Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael F. Dehoney, Appellant Pro Se. Larry Cleveland Batson,
Robert Eric Petersen, William Ansel Collins, Jr., Byron Ronald
Roberts, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM
Michael F. Dehoney appeals the district court§ 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district courtÂ’s opinion accepting the magistrate judgeÂ’s recommendation and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Dehoney v. Moore , No. CA-96-1356-4-21BE (D.S.C. March 26, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Sponsored links
