Davis vs. Stalder, (5th Cir. 1996)

Federal Circuits

Linked as:

Text


* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30572 Summary Calendar LIONELL J. DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus, RICHARD L. STALDER; C. MARTIN LENSING, Warden; C. DAVID RAGLAND; C. SCROPSHIRE, LT., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 95-CV-2024 October 3, 1996 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Because Lionell J. Davis (#118554) makes no argument that challenges the district court’s dismissal of his civil-rights action, his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on appeal is DENIED. See Carson v. Polley , 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982). Because only Davis signed the notice of appeal, he is the only appellant moving for IFP. Carter v. Stalder , 60 F.3d 238, 239 (5th Cir. 1995). The appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. - IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

No. 96-30572 -

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company