Crooks v. Moore, (4th Cir. 1997)
Linked as:
Text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6326
THOMAS D. CROOKS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, and
STEVE R. LUCAS, Plaintiff, versus
MICHAEL MOORE, Director of the South Carolina
Department of Corrections, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-94-3242-2-17AJ)
Submitted: December 12, 1996 Decided: January 31, 1997
Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas D. Crooks, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. David Leon Morrison, ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a pr eliminary injunction or a temporary restraining order. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. C rooks v. Moore , No. CA-94-3242-2-17AJ (D.S.C. Feb. 15, 1996). We also deny Appellant's motion for consolidation.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Sponsored links
