Crawford v. Pham, (4th Cir. 2006)

Status: Not Published

Docket Number: 06-1556

Linked as:

Text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1556

MARLA CRAWFORD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

TONY PHAM; CHRISTOPHER BULLARD; MRS. TIMMAS;

TONY RANDALL, Public Defender; SANDY

LEDBETTER; CHRISTOPHER COLLINS, Esquire; MR.

ETHERINGTON; HORACE HUNTER, Mr. Esquire; DAVID

LASSITER, Mr. Esquire,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District

Judge. (3:06-cv-00209-HEH)

Submitted: November 15, 2006 Decided: November 17, 2006

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marla Crawford, Appellant Pro Se. William Woodul Tunner, THOMPSON

& MCMULLAN, Richmond, Virginia; Guy Winston Horsley, Jr., Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Christopher Collins,

Richmond, Virginia; William Kerfoot Lewis, BEALE, BALFOUR, DAVIDSON

& ETHERINGTON, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Marla Crawford appeals the district court's order dismissing her civil action for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Crawford v. Pham, No. 3:06-cv-00209-HEH (E.D. Va. Apr. 12, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED