MO Child Care Assoc. v. Denice Cross, (8th Cir. 2004)
Linked as:
Text
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1793
Missouri Child Care Association, doing business as Missouri Coalition of Children's Agencies, Appellant, v. Denise Cross, Dana K. Martin, Appellees.
Submitted: June 17, 2004 Filed: July 28, 2004
Before RILEY, BOWMAN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff Missouri Child Care Association (MCCA), the prevailing party in this civil rights case, appeals the order of the District Court1 awarding attorney fees to MCCA. MCCA argues that the court abused its discretion by reducing MCCA's claim for attorney fees by sixty percent. The District Court's reason for this downward adjustment of the lodestar amount was that MCCA, though it had succeeded in changing the legal relationship between the parties, had achieved only limited success. More specifically, the court reasoned that MCCA had obtained both declaratory and injunctive relief, but that these forms of relief did not ipso facto assure any increases in reimbursements to the foster-care providers who are MCCA's members. Given MCCA's real but limited success, the court found that a sixty percent reduction of the lodestar amount was reasonable.
A plaintiff's limited success is a legitimate reason to reduce a requested fee amount. See Polacco v. Curators of Univ. of Missouri, 37 F.3d 366, 370 (8th Cir. 1994). Having considered all of MCCA's arguments in support of its claim that its success was complete, not limited, and that the requested amount of attorney fees should be awarded in full, we find those arguments unpersuasive. In the circumstances of this case, we cannot say the District Court's fee award was an abuse of its discretion.
The order of the District Court is affirmed.
Appeal from the United States
District Court for the
Western District of Missouri.
[UNPUBLISHED]
[1] The Honorable Nanette Laughrey, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
Sponsored links
