Chestnut v. SC Department of Corrections, (4th Cir. 2011)

Status: Not Published

Docket Number: 10-7748

Linked as:

Text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7748

CRAIG LATWAIN CHESTNUT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Turbeville

Correction Institution; CHARLES BROWN, SCDC Employee

Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Richard Mark Gergel, District

Judge. (3:10-cv-02050-RMG)

Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 6, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Craig Latwain Chestnut, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Craig Latwain Chestnut appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny Chestnut's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Chestnut v. S.C. Dep't of Corr., No. 3:10-cv-02050-RMG (D.S.C.

Oct. 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED