Charles Ray Overton, Petitioner-Appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-Appellee., 443 F.2d 67 (5th Cir. 1971)
Linked as:
Text
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; Jack Roberts, District Judge.
Charles Ray Overton, pro se.
Seagal V. Wheatley, U. S. Atty., Jeremiah Handy, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for respondent-appellee.
Before COLEMAN, SIMPSON, and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The District Court denied Charles Ray Overton relief under 28 U.S.C. 2255.
This Court settled the issues raised in this appeal, when it decided an appeal from Overton's co-defendant, Erwin v. United States of America, 1971, 440 F.2d 1327.
The judgment of the District Court is
Affirmed.
Notes:
* Rule 18, 5th Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
Sponsored links
This document cites
- US Code - Title 28: Judiciary and Judicial Procedure - 28 USC 2255 - Sec. 2255. Federal custody; remedies on motion attacking sentence
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - Travis Erwin, Petitioner-Appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-Appellee., 440 F.2d 1327 (5th Cir. 1971)
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - Isbell Enterprises, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York, Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marine Mart, Inc., Third Party Defendant-Appellee., 431 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1970)
See other documents that cite the same legislation
