Charles Hinton v. Andrew Murray, (4th Cir. 2011)

Status: Not Published

Linked as:

Text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6596

CHARLES EVERETTE HINTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ANDREW MURRAY; CHRISTIAN HOEL; WILLIAM ROBERT BELL; JOHN

DOE, Judicial Official for North Carolina and Mediator for

State of North Carolina; FNU PROCTOR, Magistrate; FNU DIGGS,

Magistrate; JOHN DOE, District Court Judge on File Number

11-cr-216164,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad,

Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00198-RJC)

Submitted: July 28, 2011 Decided: August 2, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Everette Hinton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Charles Everette Hinton appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hinton v. Murray, No. 3:11-cv-00198-RJC (W.D.N.C.

Apr. 27, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED