Cauthern v. Goodwill Indus, (4th Cir. 2000)
Linked as:
Text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1020 GINO CORNELIUS CAUTHERN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES, of Northwest North Carolina, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief
District Judge. (CA-98-693-1)
Submitted: June 15, 2000 Decided: June 20, 2000
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gino Cornelius Cauthern, Appellant Pro Se. Penni Pearson Bradshaw,
Eugene Hamilton Matthews, Sr., KILPATRICK STOCKTON, L.L.P.,
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM
Gino Cornelius Cauthern appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in Defendant’s favor in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Cauthern v. Goodwill Indus. , No. CA-98-693-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 19, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Sponsored links
