Capital Bridge v. IVL Technologies, (Fed. Cir. 2007)
Linked as:
Text
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
20
CAPITAL BRIDGE CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IVL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., Defendant-Appellee, and MEMCORP, INC. and CRAIG ELECTRONICS, INC., Defendants.
Brian L. Wamsley, Goodwin Procter LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. On the brief was Anthony H. Handal, Brown Rudnick Berlack Israels, LLP, of New York, New York.
Daniel P. Burke, Daniel P. Burke & Associates, PLLC, of Hauppauge, New York, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Georgia Damoulakis.
Appealed from: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Kenneth M. Karas NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 20
CAPITAL BRIDGE CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IVL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., Defendant-Appellee, and MEMCORP, INC. And CRAIG ELECTRONICS, INC., Defendants.
Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in CASE NO(S). 04-CV-4002
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, SCHALL, Circuit Judge, and BUCKLO i , District Judge).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly DATED: August 10, 2007
Jan Horbaly, Clerk i Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo, District Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.
Sponsored links
