Bynnom v. Styles, (4th Cir. 1999)

Text

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6896 SHAWN BYNNOM, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

PHILLIP STYLES, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-

trict of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CA-98-242-1-MU))

Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 14, 1999

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-

cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shawn Bynnom, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

* Although the order from which Bynnom appeals was filed on June 2, 1999, it was entered on the district court’s docket sheet

on June 4, 1999. June 4, 1999, is therefore the effective date of

the district court’s decision. See

Fed. R. Civ. P. 58 and 79(a); see also

Wilson v. Murray

, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

PER CURIAM

Shawn Bynnom seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 4 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Bynnom v. Styles , No. CA-98-242- 1-MU (W.D.N.C. June 4, 1999). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED

---