Bryant Young v. Cincinnati, Inc., (8th Cir. 1999)

Federal Circuits

Linked as:

Text


United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2015

Bryant Young, Appellant, v. Cincinnati, Inc. Appellee.

Submitted: October 27, 1999 Filed: November 1, 1999

Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Bryant Young appeals from the district courtÂ’s1 exclusion of his expert witness and exclusion of evidence of prior incidents, which preceded the entry of judgment as a matter of law in favor of Cincinnati, Inc. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in these evidentiary rulings. See Peitzmeier v. Hennessy Indus., Inc., 97 F.3d 293, 296 (8th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1196 (1997). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. Rule 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

Appeal from the United States

District Court for the

Eastern District of Arkansas.

[UNPUBLISHED]

[1] The Honorable H. David Young, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company