Brown v. Scott, (4th Cir. 2004)

Text

---

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7791 BOBBY JOE BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

BRANDON SCOTT, Investigator; CHRIS BENSEL,

Investigator; ABBEVILLE COUNTY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.

(CA-3-633-8-25)

Submitted: January 15, 2004 Decided: January 28, 2004

Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bobby Joe Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM: Bobby Joe Brown appeals the district courtÂ’s orders and judgment adopting the magistrate judgeÂ’s report and recommendation,

dismissing without prejudice BrownÂ’s civil rights complaint and

denying the motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the

record and the district courtÂ’s order and affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See

Brown v. Scott

, No. CA-3-633-8-25 (D.S.C. Sept. 5 & Oct. 14, 2003). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. AFFIRMED

---