Broadnax v. Veteran Affairs, (4th Cir. 2004)
Linked as:
Text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1487 IN RE: LISA ANNETTE BROADNAX, Debtor, ------------------------------
LDA ANNETTE BROADNAX, Plaintiff - Appellant versus
VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendant - Appellee, UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Party in Interest. No. 04-1488 IN RE: LISA ANNETTE BROADNAX, Debtor, ------------------------------
LISA ANNETTE BROADNAX, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
- 2 - VETERAN AFFAIRS, Defendant - Appellee, UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Party in Interest. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-04-42-2; CA-03-913-2; BK-02-72575-DHA; APN-03-7138)
Submitted: July 29, 2004 Decided: August 3, 2004
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lisa Annette Broadnax, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Joseph McNulty,
United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia; Gregory David Stefan,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 - PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Lisa Annette Broadnax appeals the district courtÂ’s orders: (1) dismissing an appeal from
the bankruptcy court for failing to designate the record, as required by Fed. Bankr. R. 8006, and denying her motion for
reconsideration and (2) dismissing as untimely another appeal from
a bankruptcy court order. We have reviewed the records and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See
Broadnax v. Veteran Affairs
, Nos. CA-04- 42-2; CA-03-913-2 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 9, 2004 & entered Mar. 10,
4; Apr. 1, 2004; filed Apr. 2, 2004 & entered Apr. 5, 2004). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Sponsored links
