Black vs. Bennett, (5th Cir. 1998)

Federal Circuits

Linked as:

Text


* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR .

R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50955 Summary Calendar JOHN RUFUS BLACK, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, versus TROY C. BENNETT, JR.; ABEL ACOSTA, also known as Unknown Deputy Clerk, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-96-CV-97 December 7, 1998 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * John Rufus Black, Jr., Texas state prisoner # 607439, has appealed the district courtÂ’s summary-judgment dismissal of his claims for monetary damages against Troy C. Bennett, Jr., Clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; and Abel Acosta, a deputy clerk of that court. We AFFIRM.

BlackÂ’s action is based on the appelleesÂ’ refusal to file his motion for rehearing of the Texas courtÂ’s denial of his application for discretionary review of the affirmance of his criminal conviction and sentence. However, Black has failed to contest the district courtÂ’s ruling that the appellees are entitled to quasi-judicial immunity from liability for damages relative to appelleesÂ’ said refusal to file. See Antoine v. Byers & Anderson , 508 U.S. 429, 436 (1993); Williams v. Wood , 612 F.2d 982, 985 (5th Cir. 1980).

Black§ 1983 and his supplemental state-law claim that appellees intentionally inflicted emotional distress upon him. JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

No. 97-50955

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company