Bishop v. Equivest, (4th Cir. 2003)

Federal Circuits

Linked as:

Text


UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-2099 JERRY L. BISHOP, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

PEPPERTREE RESORTS, LTD., a/k/a Equivest

Resorts Incorporated, a/k/a Equivest Finance,

a/k/a Equivest Financial, Incorporated, a/k/a

Equivest, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Dist rict Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg,

District Judge. (CA-01-87-1-T)

Submitted: January 16, 2003 Decided: March 13, 2003

Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry L. Bishop, Appellant Pro Se. Earl Thomison Holman, ADAMS,

HENDON, CARSON, CROW & SAENGER, P.A., Asheville, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM

Jerry L. Bishop appeals the district courtÂ’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to the Defendants in his age discrimination and retaliation suit and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the re asoning of the district court. See Bishop v. Peppertree Resorts, Ltd. , No. CA-01-87-1-T (W.D.N.C. July 25, 2002; Aug. 27, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company