Bank One NA vs. Pittman, (5th Cir. 2002)
Linked as:
Text
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case No. 01-60896 BANK ONE NA Plaintiff-Appellee, v. IRIS PITTMAN Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi (2:01-CV-38-LN) October 24, 2002 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM * : Appellant challenges the district courtÂ’s ruling granting Bank OneÂ’s motion to compel arbitration and to stay the AppellantÂ’s pending state law claims and denying AppellantÂ’s request for abstention and dismissal, discovery, and a jury trial. This case is indistinguishable from those that we and Bank One, N.A. v. Lake . 3 For essentially the same reasons that are set forth in our opinion in Boyd and in the district courtÂ’s opinions in Bank One, N.A. v. Coates , 4 and Bank One, N.A. v. Taylor , 5 the judgment of the district court in this case is, in all respects, AFFIRMED.
Cause No. 01-60896 -2- 2 288 F.3d 181 (5th Cir. 2002). 3 No. 01-60051 (5th Cir. April 5, 2002) (unpublished). 4 125 F. Supp. 2d 819 (S.D. Miss. 2001). 5 No. 4:01CV15-D-B (N.D. Miss. May 7, 2002) (order granting petition to compel arbitration). reviewed and ruled on in the related cases of Bank One, N.A. v. Boyd
Sponsored links
