Bank One NA vs. Jones, (5th Cir. 2003)

Text

---

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Consolidated Cases Nos. 02-60734, 02-60778,

02-60746, 02-60766, 02-60762, 02-60745,

02-60786, 02-60752, 02-60747, 02-60779,

02-60802

Summary Calendar

Case No. 02-60734

BANK ONE NA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. MICHELLE JONES,

Defendant-Appellant.

Case No. 02-60778

BANK ONE NA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. GREGORY LEDELL THOMAS; PRINCELLA THOMAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Case No. 02-60746

BANK ONE NA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. VELMA GREEN,

Defendant-Appellant.

Case No. 02-60766 BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MACK ARTHUR PICKENS, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

Case No. 02-60762 BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. J. C. ROBERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

Case No. 02-60745 BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARILYN NAILER, A/K/A MARILYN NAILOR; BARRY NAILER, A/K/A BARRY NAILOR, Defendant-Appellant.

Case No. 02-60786 BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. THOMAS WRIGHT; ANNIE WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant.

Case No. 02-60752 BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOANN NEWSON, Defendant-Appellant.

Case No. 02-60747 BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GLORIA JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

Case No. 02-60779 BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LOYD WALTON, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

Case No. 02-60802 BANK ONE NA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CLARA BUTLER, A/K/A CLARA BULTER, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi (3:01-CV-39) February 25, 2003 Before JONES, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Appellants challenge the district court's rulings granting Bank One's motions to compel arbitration and to stay the Appellants' pending state law claims. This case is indistinguishable from those that we reviewed and ruled on in the related cases of Bank One, N.A. v. Boyd1 and Bank One, N.A. v. Lake.2 For essentially the same reasons that are set forth in our opinion in Boyd and in the district court's opinion in Bank One, N.A. v. Coates,3 and Bank One, N.A. v. Taylor,4 the judgment of the district court in this case is, in all respects, AFFIRMED.

*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

1 288 F.3d 181 (5th Cir. 2002).

2 No. 01-60051 (5th Cir. April 5, 2002) (unpublished).

3 125 F. Supp. 2d 819 (S.D. Miss. 2001).

4 No. 4:01CV15-D-B (N.D. Miss. May 7, 2002) (order granting petition to compel arbitration).

---