Autrey vs. Cockrell, (5th Cir. 2001)

Federal Circuits

Linked as:

Text


* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR .

R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-10028 Summary Calendar LAWRENCE WAYNE AUTREY, Petitioner-Appellant, versus JANIE COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:99-CV-1053-Y December 14, 2001 Before JONES, SMITH and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Laurence W. Autrey (§ 2254. He argues that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for burglary of a habitation with intent to commit aggravated sexual assault.

We have reviewed the record, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, and we find no reversible error. The Texas Court of Appeals did not unreasonably conclude that any rational trier of fact could have found, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the evidence showed that Autrey had the intent to commit sexual assault. See Williams v. Taylor , 529 U.S. 362, 409 (2000); Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979). The district courtÂ’s judgment denying AutreyÂ’s habeas petition is AFFIRMED.

No. 01-10028

Sponsored links




ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

ver las páginas en versión mobile | web

© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.

Contents in vLex United States

Explore vLex

For Professionals

For Partners

Company