Anstey v. Painter, (4th Cir. 2001)
Linked as:
Text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6521 SAMUEL R. ANSTEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus
HOWARD PAINTER, Mount Olive Correctional Com-
plex, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District
Judge. (CA-99-120-5)
Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: October 9, 2001
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel R. Anstey, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Perry Macia, BAILEY &
GLASSER, L.L.P., Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM
Samuel R. Anstey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 4 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Anstey’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Anstey v. Painter , No. CA-99-120-5 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 16, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
Sponsored links
